From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lisenby v. Fidelity and Cas. Co. of New York

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 13, 1964
327 F.2d 665 (5th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 20576.

February 13, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Benjamin C. Dawkins, Jr., Chief Judge.

Warren L. Mengis, Baton Rouge, La., Nathan M. Calhoun, Vidalia, La., for appellant.

Robert T. Farr, Davenport, Farr Kelly, Monroe, La., Attorneys for Fidelity Cas. Co. of New York, appellee.

Thos. M. Hayes, Jr., Hayes, Harkey Smith, Monroe, La., for E.H. Tibbits d/b/a Tibbits Drilling Co. and Employers Cas. Co., appellees.

Before HUTCHESON and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and HOOPER, District Judge.


This is an appeal from an order granting Tibbits Drilling Co., its liability insurer, Employers Casualty Company, and Fidelity Casualty Company, insurer of Chartor Oil Co., summary judgment in a suit against them for wrongful death.

The decisive question at issue in determining the motion for summary judgment was whether a tort suit for damages in the Federal District Court in Louisiana was barred and prevented by the Louisiana Workmen's Compensation Statute.

The deceased, Lisenby, a resident of Louisiana, contracted in Mississippi for employment with a Mississippi construction company (Anders). He worked for Anders in both Mississippi and Louisiana. At the time of his accidental death he was working in Louisiana moving an oil rig onto location. Chartor Oil Co., lease owner, had engaged Tibbits to dig a well, Tibbits had engaged Anders to move the rig, and deceased worked for Anders on this job. Anders' workmen's compensation policy was issued in and limited to, Mississippi. The survivors of the deceased are now receiving benefits under the Mississippi Workmen's Compensation Statute.

The district judge, in a thoroughgoing opinion, 225 F. Supp. 870, fully and correctly setting out and discussing the facts and the law applicable thereto, determined the issue, and rendered judgment, in favor of appellees, and this appeal has followed.

We approve and adopt the opinion and order of the district judge, and, upon the consideration states, and for the reasons advanced therein by him, we affirm the judgment and order appealed from.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Lisenby v. Fidelity and Cas. Co. of New York

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 13, 1964
327 F.2d 665 (5th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

Lisenby v. Fidelity and Cas. Co. of New York

Case Details

Full title:Mrs. Doney S. LISENBY, Individually and as tutrix of her minor children…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 13, 1964

Citations

327 F.2d 665 (5th Cir. 1964)