From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lipford v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Feb 3, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2858 (W.D. La. Feb. 3, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2858

02-03-2014

JAMES LIPFORD v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.


JUDGE DEE D. DRELL


MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES D. KIRK


JUDGMENT

For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, noting the absence of objections thereto, and concurring with the Magistrate Judge's findings under the applicable law;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to remand (Doc. 7) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case is remanded to the 10th Judicial District Court, Natchitoches Parish, State of Louisiana.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED at Alexandria, Louisiana on this 3RD day of February, 2014.

_______________

DEE D. DRELL, CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Lipford v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
Feb 3, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2858 (W.D. La. Feb. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Lipford v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharm., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LIPFORD v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

Date published: Feb 3, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2858 (W.D. La. Feb. 3, 2014)

Citing Cases

West v. Red Frog Events, LLC

" Here, because there is no specific information regarding Plaintiff's medical expenses, lost wages, or other…

Taylor v. Old Republic Ins. Co.

(explaining that court “may consider the Plaintiff's refusal to sign the stipulation [that the amount in…