From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lineberger v. Ice Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1941
17 S.E.2d 502 (N.C. 1941)

Opinion

(Filed 26 November, 1941.)

Conspiracy § 3: Monopolies § 2 —

A complaint alleging that defendants conspired and agreed not to sell plaintiff ice, and that as a result thereof plaintiff's business was ruined fails to state a cause of action, and defendants' demurrer thereto should have been sustained, C. S., 2559, et. seq., not being applicable.

APPEAL by defendants from Nettles, J., at July-August Term, 1941, of GASTON. Reversed.

W. H. Sanders and S. J. Durham for plaintiff, appellee.

Cherry Hollowell for Colonial Ice Co., Inc.; H. B. Gaston for Montbell Ice Fuel Co., Inc.; O. F. Mason, Jr., for Adams Ice Coal Co., Inc., and R. H. Adams, personally; and G. B. Mason for Cherryville Ice Fuel Co., Inc., and Lincolnton Ice Fuel Co., appellants.


Civil action to recover damages resulting from an alleged unlawful combination in restraint of trade.

Plaintiff alleges that he is or has been engaged in the retail ice business in Gaston County; that defendants are engaged in the manufacture of ice for sale in the same territory; that his contract with the Colonial Ice Company, under which he obtained ice at wholesale for sale at retail, having expired, the defendants conspired and agreed not to sell ice to the plaintiff; that by reason of such unlawful combination he is unable to obtain ice economically and at a price which will enable him to conduct his business at a profit; and that as a result thereof his business has been ruined and destroyed.

The defendants demurred to the complaint for that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In their demurrer they set out with particularity wherein the complaint is deficient.

When the cause came on to be heard the judge below overruled the demurrer and the defendants excepted and appealed.


This action involves a controversy of a private nature between plaintiff and the defendants. No public interest is involved. Hence, C. S., 2559, et seq., have no application. McNeill v. Hall, ante, 73, and Rice v. Asheville Ice Co., 204 N.C. 768, 169 S.E. 707, are controlling. The judgment below is

Reversed.


Summaries of

Lineberger v. Ice Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Nov 1, 1941
17 S.E.2d 502 (N.C. 1941)
Case details for

Lineberger v. Ice Co.

Case Details

Full title:L. O. LINEBERGER v. COLONIAL ICE COMPANY, INC.; ADAMS ICE COAL CO., INC.…

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1941

Citations

17 S.E.2d 502 (N.C. 1941)
17 S.E.2d 502

Citing Cases

Sanderson v. Bateman

It was beyond the power of the legislative assembly to remit, release or diminish in any way the liabilities…

Salter v. City of Jackson

C. Appellees have failed to establish the existence of a conspiracy. Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader, 336 U.S.…