referring to a party's right to move for the confirmation of an arbitration award under § 9 as a "privilege"
Summary of this case from Photopaint Technologies v. Smartlens Corp.No. 613.
January 23, 1933, OCTOBER TERM, 1932.
Petition, for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Messrs. Irving L. Evans and Horace M. Gray for petitioner. Mr. Charles R. Hickox for respondent. Reported below: 57 F. (2d) 672.
referring to a party's right to move for the confirmation of an arbitration award under § 9 as a "privilege"
Summary of this case from Photopaint Technologies v. Smartlens Corp.Full title:MUNSON STEAMSHIP LINE v. NORTH OF ENGLAND STEAMSHIP CO., LTD
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 23, 1933
However, the court held that by filing the application for confirmation, petitioner provided respondent with…
Young v. AlagnaUpon a motion to confirm the party opposing confirmation may apparently object upon any ground which…