From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lindsey v. Keith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Oct 21, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2912 (W.D. La. Oct. 21, 2014)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2912

10-21-2014

CHARLES RAY LINDSEY LA. DOC #564560 v. WARDEN TIM KEITH


MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES

JUDGMENT

The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, [Doc. Nos. 1, 11] is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 21st day of October, 2014.

/s/_________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lindsey v. Keith

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Oct 21, 2014
CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2912 (W.D. La. Oct. 21, 2014)
Case details for

Lindsey v. Keith

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES RAY LINDSEY LA. DOC #564560 v. WARDEN TIM KEITH

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Oct 21, 2014

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-2912 (W.D. La. Oct. 21, 2014)

Citing Cases

Cook v. Nogan

At least one court in this District, citing appropriate case law, notes that "[c]ase law suggests . . . that…