From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Linden Lumber Co. v. Johnston

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth
Apr 5, 1940
139 S.W.2d 292 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940)

Opinion

Nos. 13880, 13939.

April 5, 1940.

Appeal from District Court, Hunt County; Newman Phillips, Judge.

Action by Hiram Johnston against the Linden Lumber Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals. On plaintiff's motion to issue mandate without payment of costs.

Motion overruled.

Newland, Cornett Whitworth, of Linden, and Mayo W. Neyland, of Greenville, for appellant.

Herbert Marshall, of Dallas, for appellee.


This appellee has filed a motion before us in general statutory language, saying that he is a pauper and unable to pay the costs or any part thereof, or to give security therefor.

The motion is contested and our attention called to the sworn testimony of this litigant, on the trial of the cause, in which he testified that he is agent for the "Sante Fe" Railroad at Farmersville, Texas, and has been such for 21 years, and that his salary is $248 per month.

We do not think the litigant is a pauper and are of opinion that he cannot take advantage of any statute enuring to the benefit of a pauper.

The motion is overruled.


Summaries of

Linden Lumber Co. v. Johnston

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth
Apr 5, 1940
139 S.W.2d 292 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940)
Case details for

Linden Lumber Co. v. Johnston

Case Details

Full title:LINDEN LUMBER CO. v. JOHNSTON

Court:Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth

Date published: Apr 5, 1940

Citations

139 S.W.2d 292 (Tex. Civ. App. 1940)

Citing Cases

Wood v. Gulf Oil Corp.

If he has, no confiscation results." Ward Oil Corp. v. Overton Ref. Co., Tex. Civ. App. 139 S.W.2d 292, 293.…

Railroad Commission v. Arkansas Fuel Oil

It is now settled that no confiscation, as that term is used in the statutes and the rules of the Commission,…