From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lind v. Lind

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1983
447 N.E.2d 72 (N.Y. 1983)

Opinion

Argued February 16, 1983

Decided February 23, 1983

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, OLIVER C. SUTTON, J.

Irving I. Erdheim, Leonard C. Shalleck and Ralph S. Joseph for appellant.

Alan D. Scheinkman and Miriam M. Robinson for respondent.



MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

That court properly resolved the factual disputes before it in the causes of action for separation and divorce (see Hessen v Hessen, 33 N.Y.2d 406, 408) and it not appearing that that court abused its discretion or committed an error of law, its determinations of alimony, counsel fees and the use of the marital property are beyond our review (see Patron v Patron, 40 N.Y.2d 582, 585).

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG, MEYER and SIMONS concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.


Summaries of

Lind v. Lind

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1983
447 N.E.2d 72 (N.Y. 1983)
Case details for

Lind v. Lind

Case Details

Full title:JOHN K. LIND, Appellant, v. VIOLET LIND, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 23, 1983

Citations

447 N.E.2d 72 (N.Y. 1983)
447 N.E.2d 72
460 N.Y.S.2d 524

Citing Cases

Wilbur v. Wilbur

With regard to defendant's argument that the maintenance award should be limited in duration to five years,…

Warshaw v. Warshaw

(Domestic Relations Law § 170; Brady v Brady, 64 N.Y.2d 339.) The findings of the trial court that certain…