Summary
striking down conditional use ordinance with requirements similar to the negative criteria for a use variance for lack of specificity and unlawful arrogation of the powers of the board of adjustment
Summary of this case from Trinity Hall Corp. v. Twp. of Middletown Planning Bd.Opinion
Argued April 21, 1999.
Decided May 11, 1999.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, whose decision is reported at 314 N.J. Super. 366, 714 A.2d 995 (Law Div. 1998).
Before Judges King, Wallace and Newman.
Jeffrey Kantowitz argued the cause for appellant (Goldberg, Mufson Spar, attorneys; Mr. Kantowitz, on the brief).
Brian W. Fahey argued the cause for respondent Crane Realty (Fahey Fahey, attorneys; Mr. Fahey, on the brief).
Joseph P. Depa, Jr., appeared for respondent Planning Board of the Township of Cranford.
Albert N. Stender appeared for respondent, Townshship Committee of the Township of Cranford.
We affirm for the reasons expressed in Judge Pisansky's well reasoned opinion reported at 314 N.J. Super. 366 (Law Div. 1998).