From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Limitone Enters., Inc. v. Walker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 9, 2013
102 A.D.3d 697 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-01-9

Matter of LIMITONE ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., appellants, v. Maureen WALKER, etc., et al., respondents.

Karl A. Scully, Mount Vernon, N.Y., for appellants. Nichelle A. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, Mount Vernon, N.Y. (Joana H. Aggrey of counsel), for respondents.



Karl A. Scully, Mount Vernon, N.Y., for appellants. Nichelle A. Johnson, Corporation Counsel, Mount Vernon, N.Y. (Joana H. Aggrey of counsel), for respondents.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, SANDRA L. SGROI, and ROBERT J. MILLER, JJ.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondents to rescind and annul the sale of certain real property sold pursuant to a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated September 20, 2010, and entered, upon default, in a related in rem tax lien foreclosure proceeding entitled In the Matter of Foreclosure of Tax Liens Pursuant to Chapter 783 of the Laws of 1974 and Article Eleven, Title Three of the Real Property Tax Law, by the City of Mount Vernon, New York—List of Delinquent Taxes as of November 17, 2009, Consisting of One Volume, commenced in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, under Index No. 27155/09, the petitioners appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walker, J.), entered July 7, 2011, as, in effect, denied the petition on the merits and dismissed the proceeding.

ORDERED that the order and judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof, in effect, denying the petition on the merits, and substituting therefor a provision dismissing the petition without prejudice to the petitioners seeking appropriate relief in the related in rem tax lien foreclosure proceeding if they be so advised; as so modified, the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to the respondents.

The petitioners commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondents to rescind and annul the sale of certain real property sold pursuant to a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated September 20, 2010, and entered, upon default, in a related in rem tax lien foreclosure proceeding entitled In the Matter of Foreclosure of Tax Liens Pursuant to Chapter 783 of the Laws of 1974 and Article Eleven, Title Three of the Real Property Tax Law, by the City of Mount Vernon, New York–List of Delinquent Taxes as of November 17, 2009, Consisting of One Volume, commenced in the Supreme Court, Westchester County, under Index No. 27155/09 (hereinafter the judgment). This relief should have been pursued by way of a motion to vacate the judgment, insofar as it affected the petitioners, pursuant to CPLR 317 or CPLR 5015(a) in the in rem tax lien foreclosure proceeding ( see Egloff v. Town of Lewisboro, 89 A.D.3d 792, 793, 932 N.Y.S.2d 151; Matter of Calabrese Bakeries, Inc. v. Rockland Bakery, Inc., 83 A.D.3d 1060, 1061, 923 N.Y.S.2d 556;Babu v. 29 Cortlandt St. Realty Corp., 289 A.D.2d 273, 735 N.Y.S.2d 135). Since the petitioners have improperly sought to collaterally attack the judgment by way of this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, the Supreme Court should have dismissed the petition without making a determination of the petition on the merits ( seeCPLR 7804[g]; Matter of Calabrese Bakeries, Inc. v. Rockland Bakery, Inc., 83 A.D.3d at 1061, 923 N.Y.S.2d 556;cf. Matter of Leone v. Board of Assessors, 100 A.D.3d 635, 953 N.Y.S.2d 157).

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the parties' remaining contentions.


Summaries of

Limitone Enters., Inc. v. Walker

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jan 9, 2013
102 A.D.3d 697 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Limitone Enters., Inc. v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:Matter of LIMITONE ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., appellants, v. Maureen…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jan 9, 2013

Citations

102 A.D.3d 697 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
958 N.Y.S.2d 179
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 94

Citing Cases

Limitone Enters., Inc. v. Walker

We affirm, albeit on grounds different than those relied upon by the Supreme Court. The procedure for relief…

St. Patrick's v. St. Patrick's Church of W. Troy

Plaintiffs' action was an impermissible collateral attack on the authorization order. The proper procedure…