From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lima v. DePalma

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 8, 2004
818 N.E.2d 1197 (Ohio 2004)

Opinion

No. 2003-2063.

Submitted October 13, 2004.

Decided December 8, 2004.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Allen County, No. 1-03-10, 2003-Ohio-5451.

Anthony L. Geiger, Lima City Law Director, for appellants.

Blaugrund, Herbert Martin, Inc., and David S. Kessler, Dublin, for appellee.

Barry M. Byron, Stephen L. Byron, Willoughby, and John Gotherman, Cleveland, urging reversal for amicus curiae The Ohio Municipal League.

Livorno Arnett Co., L.P.A., and Henry A. Arnett, Columbus, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Professional Firefighters.

Gittes Schulte and Fred Gittes, Columbus; Fortney Klingshirn and Neil E. Klingshirn, Akron, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Employment Lawyers' Association.


{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

{¶ 2} The court orders that the opinion of the court of appeals may not be cited as authority except by the parties inter se.

MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, FRANCIS E. SWEENEY, SR., PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O'CONNOR and O'DONNELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lima v. DePalma

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 8, 2004
818 N.E.2d 1197 (Ohio 2004)
Case details for

Lima v. DePalma

Case Details

Full title:City of Lima et al., appellants, v. Depalma, appellee

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 8, 2004

Citations

818 N.E.2d 1197 (Ohio 2004)
104 Ohio St. 3d 1201
2004 Ohio 6401

Citing Cases

Partlow v. Blue Coral-Slick 50

{¶ 32} The only Ohio case to consider the issue is DePalma v. City of Lima, 155 Ohio App.3d 81,…