From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liles v. Pitts

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 7, 1928
166 La. 297 (La. 1928)

Opinion

No. 27511.

May 7, 1928.

Appeal from First Judicial District Court, Parish of Caddo; T.F. Bell, Judge.

Hampden Story, Charles H. Blish, and Slattery Slattery, all of Shreveport, for appellant.

Hall, Johnson Hall, of Shreveport, for appellees.


This is a companion to the suit of Liles v. Texas Co. (No. 27239) 117 So. 229 decided to-day. It is for a fifth of the royalty alleged to have been collected by the defendant from the Producers' Oil Company and the Texas Company, for oil taken from the land referred to in the other suit. There was judgment for the plaintiff, from which the defendant has appealed. The issues in the two cases are the same. No argument was made or brief filed for the appellee. For the reasons given in Liles v. Texas Co. (No. 27239) 117 So. 229.fn1

Ante, p. 293.

The judgment appealed from is annulled, and the plaintiffs' demand is rejected, and their suit dismissed, at their cost.


Summaries of

Liles v. Pitts

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 7, 1928
166 La. 297 (La. 1928)
Case details for

Liles v. Pitts

Case Details

Full title:MARY J. LILES ET AL. v. L.J. PITTS

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: May 7, 1928

Citations

166 La. 297 (La. 1928)
117 So. 230

Citing Cases

Southeastern Public Service Company v. Barras

In order for one coowner or coheir to prescribe against the other, his possession must be clearly hostile to…

Watson v. Crown-Zellerbach Corp.

He cites LSA-C.C. Article 3503; Hill v. Richey, 221 La. 402, 59 So.2d 434; Sattler v. Pellichino, La.App., 71…