From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ligons v. Crittenton Hospital

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 18, 2010
486 Mich. 977 (Mich. 2010)

Opinion

No. 139978.

June 18, 2010.

reported below: 285 Mich App 337.


Leave to Appeal Granted:

The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether the plaintiff may amend his affidavits of merit in light of Bush v Shabahang, 484 Mich 156 (2009), and/or MCL 600.2301, and (2) whether the recent amendment of MCR 2.118 applies to the plaintiffs affidavits of merit.

The Michigan Association for Justice and the Michigan Defense Trial Counsel, Inc. are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


I would not grant leave with regard to question "(2) whether the recent amendment of MCR 2.118 applies to the plaintiffs affidavits of merit." This question was expressly resolved by this Court's February 16, 2010 order amending MCR 2.118. The order specified that the amendment was "effective May 1, 2010." 485 Mich ccxvi (2010). Clearly the amendment cannot apply here; it took effect not only long after plaintiff filed his affidavits of merit, but after the Court of Appeals issued its opinion and, indeed, even after plaintiff filed his application in this Court. Accordingly, we waste time and resources — of the parties, of organizations filing briefs amicus curiae, and of this Court — by directing the parties to address whether the amended version of MCR 2.118 should apply in this case.


Summaries of

Ligons v. Crittenton Hospital

Supreme Court of Michigan
Jun 18, 2010
486 Mich. 977 (Mich. 2010)
Case details for

Ligons v. Crittenton Hospital

Case Details

Full title:DUJUAN LIGONS, Personal Representative of EDRIS LIGONS…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Jun 18, 2010

Citations

486 Mich. 977 (Mich. 2010)

Citing Cases

Ligons v. Crittenton Hospital

We granted leave and directed the parties to address the following issues: "(1) whether the plaintiff may…