Opinion
No. 13-16042 D.C. No. 3:12-cv-06360-JST
01-08-2014
LIFESCAN, INC.; JOHNSON & JOHNSON, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; CONDUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; PHARMATECH SOLUTIONS, INC.; DECISION DIAGNOSTICS, CORP., Defendants - Appellants.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted December 3, 2013
San Francisco, California
Before: TROTT, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Defendants appeal the district court's order granting plaintiffs' request for preliminary injunctive relief, enjoining defendants from using images of plaintiffs' products on defendants' Shasta GenStrip packaging and in its advertising. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
Our sole inquiry is whether the district court abused its discretion in granting preliminary injunctive relief, and we conclude that the district court properly exercised its discretion. Winter v. Natural Res. Def. Council, 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing factors for district court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int'l, Inc., 686 F.2d 750, 752-53 (9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).
AFFIRMED.