From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liddle Robinson v. Kidder, Pea-Body Co.

U.S.
Jan 11, 1999
525 U.S. 1071 (1999)

Summary

holding as far as equitable relief is concerned, "a plaintiff has to prove that he is likely to be harmed by the defendant's wrongful conduct unless that conduct is enjoined" and not that there was actual damage

Summary of this case from ACT, INC. v. SYLVAN LEARNING SYSTEMS, INC.

Opinion

No. 98-847.

January 11, 1999.


C.A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 146 F. 3d 899.


Summaries of

Liddle Robinson v. Kidder, Pea-Body Co.

U.S.
Jan 11, 1999
525 U.S. 1071 (1999)

holding as far as equitable relief is concerned, "a plaintiff has to prove that he is likely to be harmed by the defendant's wrongful conduct unless that conduct is enjoined" and not that there was actual damage

Summary of this case from ACT, INC. v. SYLVAN LEARNING SYSTEMS, INC.

holding that court that stays civil action pending arbitration retains jurisdiction to confirm arbitration award

Summary of this case from Laprade v. Kidder, Peabody Co., Inc.
Case details for

Liddle Robinson v. Kidder, Pea-Body Co.

Case Details

Full title:LIDDLE ROBINSON, L. L. P. v. KIDDER, PEA-BODY CO., INC

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 11, 1999

Citations

525 U.S. 1071 (1999)

Citing Cases

Noel v. Hall

Because Turk is a case predating the 1986 amendments to the Wiretap Act, we have rejected its reasoning to…

Konop v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.

Indeed, the intersection of the Wiretap Act and the Stored Communications Act is a complex, often convoluted,…