From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Licata v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 22, 1937
249 App. Div. 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

January 22, 1937.


In an action for damages for injuries sustained by an infant plaintiff, who fell from the top of a pile of beams lawfully placed on the highway, judgment for plaintiff reversed on the law and the complaint dismissed, with costs. In our opinion, the spaces of about five inches between the beams on the top of a pile, into one of which the infant plaintiff's foot slipped, causing him to trip, did not create a dangerous condition which required the appellant to anticipate an accident such as happened to the infant plaintiff. In Boylhart v. DiMarco Reimann, Inc. ( 270 N.Y. 217) the beams were piled in such an insecure and defective manner as to create an inherently dangerous condition. Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P.J., dissents and votes to affirm. Appellant did not move to dismiss on the ground that a dangerous condition was not shown and did not except to the charge in that respect. It may not be held as a matter of law that appellant did not leave the lumber in a condition unsafe for children likely to play thereon.


Summaries of

Licata v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 22, 1937
249 App. Div. 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Licata v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:FRANK LICATA, an Infant under the Age of Fourteen Years, by JESSIE LICATA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 22, 1937

Citations

249 App. Div. 848 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Citing Cases

Schiff v. John Arborio, Inc.

The photographs and other proof offered by appellants make it clear it would be easy to walk around the pile…