From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liao v. Junious

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 29, 2016
812 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2016)

Summary

finding prejudice where counsel's failure to corroborate defendant's medical condition led to devastating cross-examination and ridicule of defense theory by prosecutor

Summary of this case from Dixon v. Yates

Opinion

No. 14–55897.

01-29-2016

YUN HSENG LIAO, Petitioner–Appellant, v. Maurice JUNIOUS, Respondent–Appellee.



Summaries of

Liao v. Junious

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Jan 29, 2016
812 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2016)

finding prejudice where counsel's failure to corroborate defendant's medical condition led to devastating cross-examination and ridicule of defense theory by prosecutor

Summary of this case from Dixon v. Yates
Case details for

Liao v. Junious

Case Details

Full title:YUN HSENG LIAO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. MAURICE JUNIOUS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 29, 2016

Citations

812 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2016)
16 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1141
2016 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1063

Citing Cases

Dixon v. Yates

One doubts that there is a lawyer alive who, with doctors available to prove a medical condition, would use…