From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Blackburn

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 24, 1985
759 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir. 1985)

Summary

adopting dissenting opinion of Ervin, J.

Summary of this case from Bright v. McClure

Opinion

Nos. 83-1040(L), 83-1041.

Argued October 2, 1984.

Decided April 24, 1985.

Harry H. Harkins, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N.C. (Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., Millard R. Rich, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., Raleigh, N.C., Jane S. Barkley, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for appellants.

George Daly, Charlotte, N.C., for appellee.

(Daniel H. Pollitt, Norman B. Smith, Greensboro, N.C., Dean Shangler, Law Student, University of North Carolina, Jay Trehy, Law Student, University of North Carolina on brief), for amicus curiae.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina.

Before WINTER, Chief Judge, and RUSSELL, WIDENER, HALL, PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, ERVIN, CHAPMAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


For the reasons adequately set forth in Judge Ervin's dissent to the original panel opinion, Lewis v. Blackburn, 734 F.2d 1000, 1008-1012 (4th Cir. 1984), we reverse the decision of the district court. 555 F. Supp. 713. We hold that the district court erred as a matter of law in finding that Georgia Lewis was not reappointed because she protested matters of public concern rather than matters of her immediate self-interest, within the meaning of the Supreme Court's ruling in Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 103 S.Ct. 1684, 75 L.Ed.2d 708 (1983). Accordingly, the decision of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded for the entry of judgment in favor of the defendants.

The decision in Connick was not handed down until after the district court rendered its decision in this case, but the parties were invited to and did file supplemental briefs in response to that opinion.

Chief Judge Winter and Judge Wilkinson would affirm the district court's decision. They dissent on the grounds articulated in the original panel's majority opinion. Lewis, 734 F.2d at 1000-08.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Blackburn

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Apr 24, 1985
759 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir. 1985)

adopting dissenting opinion of Ervin, J.

Summary of this case from Bright v. McClure

adopting dissenting opinion of Ervin, J., 734 F.2d 1000, 1008 (4th Cir. 1984)

Summary of this case from Arvinger v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

In Lewis v. Blackburn, 759 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir. 1985), the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals interpreted the public concern standard of Connick to mean that a magistrate who was not reappointed because she voiced her opposition to being required to perform clerical duties such as microfilming had not made out a claim under the First Amendment because her complaints were directed to her own personal work and not matters of public concern.

Summary of this case from Pressman v. Unc-Charlotte
Case details for

Lewis v. Blackburn

Case Details

Full title:GEORGIA J. LEWIS, APPELLEE, v. R. MAX BLACKBURN, APPELLANT, AND FRANK W…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Apr 24, 1985

Citations

759 F.2d 1171 (4th Cir. 1985)

Citing Cases

Pressman v. Unc-Charlotte

Id. at 150, n. 10, 75 L.Ed.2d at 722, n. 10, 103 S.Ct. at 1692, n. 10. In Lewis v. Blackburn, 759 F.2d 1171…

McWaters v. Rick

Thus, it is useful to consider other decisions involving analogous plaintiffs. For example, in Lewis v.…