From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lewis v. Barclays American/Mortgage Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 24, 1992
419 S.E.2d 538 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

A92A0954.

DECIDED APRIL 24, 1992. RECONSIDERATION DENIED MAY 12, 1992.

Dispossessory. Clayton State Court. Before Judge Carbo.

Ric Lewis, pro se. Prior Buser, Thomas E. Prior, Charles G. Barger, Jr., for appellee.


The Magistrate Court of Clayton County entered a judgment in this dispossessory action in favor of plaintiff Barclays American/Mortgage Corporation and against defendants Ric Lewis and Carmen Lewis. Defendant Ric Lewis appealed to the State Court of Clayton County which granted plaintiff's motions for judgment on the pleadings and for summary judgment, and issued a writ of possession to plaintiff. Defendant Ric Lewis then filed this direct appeal.

Because the appeal to this Court is taken from the decision of a state court reviewing a decision of a magistrate court by de novo proceeding involving a subject matter not otherwise subject to a right of direct appeal, the discretionary appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-35 were required and this appeal must be dismissed. Handler v. Hulsey, 199 Ga. App. 751 ( 406 S.E.2d 225); OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (11).

Appeal dismissed. Cooper, J., concurs. Sognier, C. J., concurs in the judgment only.

DECIDED APRIL 24, 1992 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED MAY 12, 1992 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Lewis v. Barclays American/Mortgage Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 24, 1992
419 S.E.2d 538 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

Lewis v. Barclays American/Mortgage Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LEWIS et al. v. BARCLAYS AMERICAN/MORTGAGE CORPORATION

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 24, 1992

Citations

419 S.E.2d 538 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
419 S.E.2d 538

Citing Cases

Salaam v. Nasheed

"Because the appeal to this Court is taken from the decision of a state court reviewing a decision of a…

English v. Delbridge

In the case sub judice, the judgment of the superior court entered on the jury verdict after a trial de novo…