From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Levison v. Levison

Michigan Court of Appeals
Sep 23, 1968
163 N.W.2d 834 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

Docket No. 3,595.

Decided September 23, 1968.

Appeal from Oakland, Roberts (Farrell E.), J. Submitted Division 2 May 7, 1968, at Detroit. (Docket No. 3,595.) Decided September 23, 1968.

Complaint by Pauline F. Levison against F. Robert Levison for a decree of divorce and property settlement, and an award of alimony and child support. Defendant counterclaimed for divorce. Judgment of divorce and property settlement granted to plaintiff, and alimony and child support awarded. Defendant appeals. Plaintiff cross-appeals. Affirmed.

Hartman, Beier, Howlett McConnell, for plaintiff.

Paruk Miller, for defendant.


Pauline F. Levison was granted an absolute divorce from F. Robert Levison, who appeals claiming the trial court abused its discretion in the valuation and division of the marital property and in the support and alimony awards. A cross-appeal asserts the court erred in determining title to certain property alleged to be part of the marital assets.

The record contains evidence which adequately supports the trial judge's valuation of the marital property. His order dividing the property has not been shown to have been so unfair nor does the amount of alimony and child support decreed appear so unreasonable as to amount to an abuse of discretion.

The cross-appeal asserts the court erred in excluding certain assets from the marital property. The evidence of ownership was conflicting and we cannot say the trial court's determination was clearly erroneous.

Affirmed. Costs to appellee.

T.G. KAVANAGH, P.J., and R.B. BURNS and DALTON, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Levison v. Levison

Michigan Court of Appeals
Sep 23, 1968
163 N.W.2d 834 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Levison v. Levison

Case Details

Full title:LEVISON v. LEVISON

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 23, 1968

Citations

163 N.W.2d 834 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
163 N.W.2d 834

Citing Cases

Keen v. Keen

Defendant claims the trial court erred in valuing certain assets of the marital estate and in including or…