From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lester v. Rich's, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 7, 1975
214 S.E.2d 732 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

50354.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 26, 1975.

DECIDED APRIL 7, 1975.

Motion to set aside. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Tillman.

Ronald Lester, pro se. Carter, Ansley, Smith McLendon, A. Jerry Sorrells, for appellee.


Rich's, Inc., d/b/a Richway, filed a motion for summary judgment against Ronald Lester on July 30, 1974. The motion was sustained, and counsel for Richway was instructed to prepare an order. The order was prepared and filed in the office of the clerk on July 31, 1974.

Ronald Lester, against whom this motion was granted, filed a motion to vacate and set aside said order on September 19, 1974, some 50 days later, because he had not received a copy of the order.

After a hearing, Lester's motion was denied. The court stated in the last order that petitioner was notified of the court's ruling; was informed of his right of appeal; had notice that the motion for summary judgment was sustained and "no burden was on the defendant to serve plaintiff with a copy of said order." Plaintiff appeals. Held:

1. Common courtesy required counsel for defendant to serve a copy of the order on plaintiff. Especially in this case, because plaintiff was not represented by counsel, but appeared in his own behalf. But we are not aware of any rule or law which absolutely requires service of a written judgment, pursuant to the court's oral statement as to his intention to sustain the motion for summary judgment. Litigants and their counsel are expected to keep themselves informed as to the status of their cases in court. Here plaintiff was aware that the motion was sustained and that a formal order in writing was to be prepared sustaining same. Donaldson v. Roberts, 109 Ga. 832 ( 35 S.E. 277); Caylor v. Wheat, 210 Ga. 429 ( 80 S.E.2d 688).

2. The motion to set aside must be predicated upon some non-amendable defect which appears upon the face of the record or pleadings. Alexander v. Blackmon, 129 Ga. App. 214, 216 (3) ( 199 S.E.2d 376). The burden was on the plaintiff, if he desired to appeal, to determine when the judgment was filed in the trial court. Jordan v. Caldwell, 229 Ga. 343 ( 191 S.E.2d 530); Thomas v. Allstate Ins. Co., 133 Ga. App. 193, 194, 195 ( 210 S.E.2d 361).

Judgment affirmed. Deen, P. J., and Stolz, J., concur.

SUBMITTED FEBRUARY 26, 1975 — DECIDED APRIL 7, 1975.


Summaries of

Lester v. Rich's, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Apr 7, 1975
214 S.E.2d 732 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Lester v. Rich's, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LESTER v. RICH'S, INC

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Apr 7, 1975

Citations

214 S.E.2d 732 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
214 S.E.2d 732

Citing Cases

Cranman Ins. Agency v. Wilson Inc.

But that is a distinction without a difference because here, too, although the court possesses general…