From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lester v. Michael Henthorne of Littler Mendleson PC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Oct 28, 2014
Civil Action No. 3:14-3625-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:14-3625-TMC

10-28-2014

Steve Lester, Plaintiff, v. Michael Henthorne of Littler Mendleson PC, Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff Steve Lester, proceeding pro se, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial handling. Before the court is the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. (ECF No. 9). Plaintiff was advised of his right to file objections to the Report. (ECF No. 9, p. 5). Plaintiff filed timely objections. (ECF No. 11).

The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court need not conduct a de novo review when a party makes only "general and conclusory objections that do not direct the court to a specific error in the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). In that case, the court reviews the Report only for clear error. See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005).

Although Plaintiff filed objections, his objections fail to address any specific, dispositive portion of the Report. The objections are non-specific, unrelated to the dispositive portions of the Report, or merely restate Plaintiff's claims. The court has thoroughly reviewed the Report and Plaintiff's objections and finds no reason to deviate from the Report's recommended disposition.

Accordingly, the court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 9) and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Timothy M. Cain

United States District Judge
October 28, 2014
Anderson, South Carolina

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL

The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this order pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Lester v. Michael Henthorne of Littler Mendleson PC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Oct 28, 2014
Civil Action No. 3:14-3625-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2014)
Case details for

Lester v. Michael Henthorne of Littler Mendleson PC

Case Details

Full title:Steve Lester, Plaintiff, v. Michael Henthorne of Littler Mendleson PC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Oct 28, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:14-3625-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 28, 2014)

Citing Cases

Washington v. Trident Med. Ctr.

In sum, Plaintiff's objections are non-specific as they are "unrelated to the dispositive portions of the…

Wandji v. Wilkie

Plaintiff's objections are thus non-specific in that they are "unrelated to the dispositive portions of the…