From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leslie v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 20, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-20

In the Matter of Reginald D. LESLIE, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.

Reginald D. Leslie, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.



Reginald D. Leslie, Dannemora, petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent.
Before: PETERS, P.J., ROSE, LAHTINEN and GARRY, JJ.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

A fight broke out among 26 inmates in the yard. During the melee, petitioner was observed throwing punches at an unidentified inmate and ignoring orders to cease such activity. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with engaging in violent conduct, refusing a direct order, creating a disturbance and fighting. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of the correction officers familiar with the incident, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of McNeil v. Fischer, 95 A.D.3d 1520, 1521, 944 N.Y.S.2d 401 [2012];Matter of Mahon v. Goord, 20 A.D.3d 837, 837, 798 N.Y.S.2d 799 [2005],appeal dismissed5 N.Y.3d 879, 808 N.Y.S.2d 142, 842 N.E.2d 28 [2005] ). The contrary testimony of petitioner's inmate witness presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see Matter of Barnes v. Prack, 87 A.D.3d 1216, 1217, 930 N.Y.S.2d 291 [2011];Matter of Harvey v. Woods, 53 A.D.3d 988, 988, 862 N.Y.S.2d 630 [2008] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions have not been preserved for our review due to his failure to either raise them at the hearing or in his administrative appeal.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Leslie v. Fischer

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Jun 20, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Leslie v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Reginald D. LESLIE, Petitioner, v. Brian FISCHER, as…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 20, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 1264 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
967 N.Y.S.2d 243
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4656

Citing Cases

Todd v. Annucci

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, which states that petitioner was…

Schaffer v. Zucker

Thereafter, however, Lamkin failed to provide the requested documentation by the extended deadline; as a…