From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lerman v. O'Donnell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland County
Nov 1, 1940
16 A.2d 109 (Me. 1940)

Opinion

Decided November 1, 1940.

In this action of negligence, the defendant has the verdict and the case comes forward on the plaintiff's general motion for a new trial.

The plaintiff was injured in the evening of October 21, 1939, in a motor truck collision on the state highway in the Town of Cumberland when the light truck loaded with junk which he was driving met a heavy duty truck operated by the defendant's employee and the cars came together. There is a sharp conflict in the evidence as to the position of the trucks on the highway when the collision took place, and the credibility of the witnesses called to the stand on the one side and the other is of vital importance. The case presents issues of fact peculiarly within the province of the jury to determine. On the record brought forward, it cannot be held that the verdict was manifestly wrong.

Motion overruled.

Jacob H. Berman, Henry N. Taylor, Augustus G. Glen, Sidney W. Wernick, for plaintiff.

William B. Mahoney, for defendant.


Summaries of

Lerman v. O'Donnell

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland County
Nov 1, 1940
16 A.2d 109 (Me. 1940)
Case details for

Lerman v. O'Donnell

Case Details

Full title:MORRIS LERMAN vs. GEORGE C. O'DONNELL

Court:Supreme Judicial Court of Maine. Cumberland County

Date published: Nov 1, 1940

Citations

16 A.2d 109 (Me. 1940)
137 Me. 329

Citing Cases

Bowe v. Willis

The weight to be given the testimony of the witnesses and the physical evidence was ". . . peculiarly within…

Beauchesne v. Sargent

Thus was presented a factual issue, one peculiarly proper for settlement by the jury. See Lerman v.…