From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lenhart v. Associates

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Nov 21, 1975
356 N.E.2d 749 (Ohio Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. L-75-117

Decided November 21, 1975.

Professional associations — Liability — Same as general corporations — Physicians organization under R. C. 1785.02 — Liable for negligence of officers and agents.

1. A professional association comprising physicians, formed pursuant to R. C. 1785.02 et seq., has the same general liability features as a general corporation. R. C. 1785.08.

2. Professional associations of physicians, organized pursuant to R. C. Chapter 1785, are liable for the negligent acts of the physicians who are operating and acting as their agents or officers.

APPEAL: Court of Appeals for Lucas County.

Mr. F. Al Wysocki and Mr. George Gernot, III, for appellants.

Messrs. Finn, Manahan Pietrykowski, for appellee.


Plaintiffs, the appellants herein, filed a complaint charging medical malpractice against defendants Westhoven, Link, Lutton and Hotchkiss, physicians and surgeons, and against their professional association, defendant Toledo Urology Associates, Inc., the appellee herein. Plaintiffs appeal from a final judgment of the trial court dismissing appellee from this action for failure of plaintiffs to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. This judgment resulted from a motion to dismiss filed by the defendant corporation. The final judgment recited, pursuant to Civ. R. 54(B), that "there was no just reason for delay."

Ohio laws permit groups of professionals to form professional associations. R. C. 1785.02. This type of business organization has been recognized for sometime in other states. Group Health Assn. v. Moor (D.C. Cir. 1938), 24 F. Supp. 445; Complete Service Bureau v. San Diego County Med. Soc. (1954), 43 Cal.2d 201, 272 P.2d 497; State Electro-Medical Institute v. State (1905), 74 Neb. 40, 103 N.W. 1078.

In Ohio, the professional association organized under R. C. Chapter 1785 should be regarded as a corporation. O'Neill v. United States (N. D. Ohio 1968), 14 Ohio Misc. 61, 281 F. Supp. 359, affirmed 410 F.2d 888.

The Committee on Professional Ethics of the American Bar Association noted that the characteristics of a professional association are: "(1) limited liability; (2) centralized management; (3) continuity of life; (4) free transferability of interests." See, The New Ohio Professional Associations Act and the Proclusion of Corporations from the Practice of Law, 24 Ohio St. L. J. 685, 689 (1963).

A medical association has the same general liability features as a general corporation. R. C. 1785.08; Smith, Professional Corporations in Ohio: The Time for Statutory Revision, 30 Ohio St. L. J. 439, 448-450 (1969); Vesely, The Ohio Professional Association Law, 13 Western Reserve L. R. 195, 203 (1962).

Corporations may be held liable for the negligent acts of physicians. 42 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d 649, Physicians and Surgeons, Section 128; Cooper v. Sisters of Charity (1971), 27 Ohio St.2d 242, 254; Avellone v. St. John's Hospital (1956), 165 Ohio St. 467.

The second issue set forth in plaintiffs' brief, concerning a dismissal of the defendant Professional Association, construed as an assignment of error is, therefore, well taken. The judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County is reversed and this cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings according to law.

Judgment reversed.

STEPHENSON and COLLER, JJ., concur.

STEPHENSON, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, and COLLER, J., retired, of the Court of Common Pleas of Wood County and assigned to active duty under authority of Section 6(C), Article IV, Constitution, designated to sit in the Sixth Appellate District.


Summaries of

Lenhart v. Associates

Court of Appeals of Ohio
Nov 21, 1975
356 N.E.2d 749 (Ohio Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Lenhart v. Associates

Case Details

Full title:LENHART, APPELLANTS, v. TOLEDO UROLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC., APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio

Date published: Nov 21, 1975

Citations

356 N.E.2d 749 (Ohio Ct. App. 1975)
356 N.E.2d 749

Citing Cases

Sloan v. Metro. Health Council

In addition, it is beyond question that the corporate entity is liable for malpractice committed by one of…

Skolnick v. Cincinnati Ins. Cos.

With respect to the commercial policy, Nadler is undoubtedly a corporate insured under the holding of…