From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lemus v. Timberland Apartments, L.L.C.

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Jul 1, 2011
3:10-CV-1071-PK (D. Or. Jul. 1, 2011)

Opinion

3:10-CV-1071-PK.

July 1, 2011


ORDER


Magistrate Judge Paul Papak filed his Findings and Recommendation on May 23, 2011. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. See § 636(b)(1)(C); Simpson v. Lear Astronics Corp., 77 F.3d 1170, 1174-75 (9th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error. I determine there is no just reason for delay.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#33). Timberland Apartments, L.L.C., W.R. Townhomes F, L.L.C., and Polygon Northwest Company, L.L.C.'s motion to dismiss Salomon Solorio's claims for failure to prosecute (#29) are GRANTED. Solorio's claims against all defendants are DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lemus v. Timberland Apartments, L.L.C.

United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division
Jul 1, 2011
3:10-CV-1071-PK (D. Or. Jul. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Lemus v. Timberland Apartments, L.L.C.

Case Details

Full title:JESUS LEMUS and SALOMON SOLORIO, Plaintiffs, v. TIMBERLAND APARTMENTS…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division

Date published: Jul 1, 2011

Citations

3:10-CV-1071-PK (D. Or. Jul. 1, 2011)

Citing Cases

Castillo v. Spencer's Air Conditioning & Appliance Inc.

In contrast, if the putative joint employer supplies the “vast majority” of the intermediary company's work,…