From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lemons v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 20, 1984
322 S.E.2d 521 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

Summary

holding that “[t]he court did not err in excluding evidence that the defendant had offered to take a polygraph examination”

Summary of this case from Parfenuk v. State

Opinion

69194.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1984.

Child molestation. Cobb Superior Court. Before Judge Hines.

Nicholas E. Bakatsas, for appellant.

Thomas J. Charron, District Attorney, Debra H. Bernes, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The defendant appeals his conviction of three counts of child molestation. Held:

1. The court did not err in excluding evidence that the defendant had offered to take a polygraph examination. See Durham v. State, 240 Ga. 203 (3) ( 240 S.E.2d 14) (1977).

2. The evidence was sufficient to enable a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty of all three offenses beyond a reasonable doubt. See generally Crawford v. State, 245 Ga. 89 ( 263 S.E.2d 131) (1980).

Judgment affirmed. Pope and Benham, JJ., concur.


DECIDED SEPTEMBER 20, 1984.


Summaries of

Lemons v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Sep 20, 1984
322 S.E.2d 521 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

holding that “[t]he court did not err in excluding evidence that the defendant had offered to take a polygraph examination”

Summary of this case from Parfenuk v. State
Case details for

Lemons v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEMONS v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Sep 20, 1984

Citations

322 S.E.2d 521 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)
172 Ga. App. 193

Citing Cases

Parfenuk v. State

The general rule in Georgia is that the results of polygraph tests, including voice stress tests, whether…

Brown v. State

Additionally, evidence that the defendant was willing or unwilling to submit to a polygraph examination is…