From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lemlek v. Israel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 26, 1990
163 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Summary

In Bienz v. Central Suffolk Hospital, 557 N.Y.S.2d 139 (N.Y.App. Div. 1990), the New York court held that a telephone call for the purpose of initiating treatment could be sufficient to create a physician-patient relationship.

Summary of this case from Lection v. Dyll

Opinion

July 26, 1990


Motion for reargument, or in the alternative for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Asch, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Lemlek v. Israel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jul 26, 1990
163 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

In Bienz v. Central Suffolk Hospital, 557 N.Y.S.2d 139 (N.Y.App. Div. 1990), the New York court held that a telephone call for the purpose of initiating treatment could be sufficient to create a physician-patient relationship.

Summary of this case from Lection v. Dyll
Case details for

Lemlek v. Israel

Case Details

Full title:LEMLEK v. ISRAEL

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jul 26, 1990

Citations

163 A.D.2d 269 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
557 N.Y.S.2d 139

Citing Cases

Sterling v. Johns Hopkins

That is, these courts would consider that the issue of whether a physician-patient relationship exists may…

Marshall v. Rosenberg

intiff speak to Connolly and relay his advice to the Twin Tiers scribe, did an employee of Retina Associates…