From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Legard v. EQT Prod. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION
Sep 30, 2013
Case No. 1:10CV00041 (W.D. Va. Sep. 30, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10CV00041

2013-09-30

EDWIN F. LEGARD, JR., ETC., Plaintiff, v. EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER CERTIFYING CLASS


By: James P. Jones

United States District Judge

Before the court are Objections of EQT Production Company to Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge on the Motions for Class Certification (ECF No. 273) ("Objections by EQT"), and Objection to Report and Recommendation on Motions for Class Certification (ECF No. 274) ("Objection by Plaintiff"), which have been fully briefed and argued. Based upon my de novo consideration of the matters to which the Objections were directed, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Objections by EQT are DENIED;

2. The Objection by Plaintiff is GRANTED;

2. The magistrate judge's Report and Recommendations (ECF No. 266) are ACCEPTED, except as to the breach of contract claims, and provided that the class definition is modified as set forth below herein;

3. The Motion for Class Certification, Appointment of Class Counsel, and Appointment of Class Representatives (ECF No. 71) is GRANTED and this action is hereby certified as a class action pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

4. The class certified (the "Class") is defined as follows:

Each person to whom EQT Production Company or its predecessors ("EQT") has paid at any time from January 1, 1995, to the present or is currently paying royalties under a lease on gas produced by EQT in Virginia and which lease is silent as to the deduction of costs, according to business records maintained by EQT.
The Class excludes (a) EQT; (b) the federal government; (c) any person who serves as a judge in this civil action and his or her spouse; (d) any person who operates a gas well in Virginia; and (e) any person who holds a working interest ownership in a well operated by EQT in Virginia.

5. Eva Mae Adkins is appointed as Class representative; and

6. The following law firms and lawyers are appointed jointly as Class counsel: Lieff Cabraser Heiman & Bernstein, LLP; Daniel Coker Horton & Bell, P.A.; Glubiak Law Office; Barrett Law Group, P.A.; and White Law Firm.

James P. Jones

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Legard v. EQT Prod. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION
Sep 30, 2013
Case No. 1:10CV00041 (W.D. Va. Sep. 30, 2013)
Case details for

Legard v. EQT Prod. Co.

Case Details

Full title:EDWIN F. LEGARD, JR., ETC., Plaintiff, v. EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ABINGDON DIVISION

Date published: Sep 30, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:10CV00041 (W.D. Va. Sep. 30, 2013)

Citing Cases

EQT Prod. Co. v. Adair

The district court adopted the magistrate judge's R & R but certified additional classes and claims. See…