From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LeFelt v. Nasarow

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 29, 1962
76 N.J. Super. 576 (App. Div. 1962)

Opinion

Argued October 22, 1962 —

Decided October 29, 1962.

Before Judges CONFORD, GAULKIN and KILKENNY.

Mr. Samuel Doan argued the cause for appellants ( Messrs. Stalter, Doan DeYoe, attorneys for appellant Aetna Insurance Company; Mr. James H. McLeod, attorney for appellant The Phoenix Insurance Company; Mr. Aaron Dines, on the brief).

Mr. Archie Elkins argued the cause for respondents ( Mr. Robert A. Elkins, on the brief).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Kolovsky in the Law Division. LeFelt v. Nasarow, 71 N.J. Super. 538 ( Law Div. 1962).


Summaries of

LeFelt v. Nasarow

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Oct 29, 1962
76 N.J. Super. 576 (App. Div. 1962)
Case details for

LeFelt v. Nasarow

Case Details

Full title:FLORENCE LeFELT AND REUBEN LeFELT, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WASILI…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Oct 29, 1962

Citations

76 N.J. Super. 576 (App. Div. 1962)
185 A.2d 217

Citing Cases

Willis v. Security Ins. Group

If that exclusion applies to Willis in this situation, Security would be liable whether Endorsement No. 4 is…

United States Underwriters Ins. v. Kum Gang Inc.

Despite the parking exception specifically defined in the automobile exclusion, the supreme court, relying…