From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leet v. Grants

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1868
36 Cal. 288 (Cal. 1868)

Opinion

         Appeal from the District Court, Fourteenth Judicial District, Placer County.

         This was an action on a promissory note, on which the plaintiff recovered judgment as prayed, by default; whereupon execution issued and was levied on the property of the defendant. On motion then made on behalf of the defendant, based on affidavits showing that a valid defense existed to a part of the sum for which judgment had been rendered, and further, that said default suffered by defendant resulted from the miscarriage of the mails, and not from any willful neglect of the defendant to interpose the same within time, the Court, by its order, set aside said judgment and gave the defendant leave to answer. The plaintiff moved as an amendment thereto that the granting of said motion be made only on the terms, as a condition precedent, that all of plaintiff's costs in the action until then incurred, including the costs made on the execution, be paid by the defendant. The Court refused to so amend said order, and the plaintiff excepted to the order as made, and appealed.

         COUNSEL:

         C. A. Tuttle, for Appellant.

          J. F. Hubbard, for Respondent.


         JUDGES: Sprague, J.

         OPINION

          SPRAGUE, Judge

         In granting the order setting aside the judgment entered by default, upon the facts presented as the basis of the motion, the Court below seems to have very properly exercised its discretionary powers; but such order should have contained the statutory prerequisite to its taking effect, that applicant pay all costs accruing to the plaintiff in the cause up to the date of the filing and service of the motion. (Sec. 68 Practice Act; Howe v. Independence Company, 29 Cal. 74.)

         With such modification the order should be permitted to stand, respondent paying the costs of this appeal.

         So ordered, and cause remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Leet v. Grants

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1868
36 Cal. 288 (Cal. 1868)
Case details for

Leet v. Grants

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL T. LEET v. CONRAD GRANTS

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1868

Citations

36 Cal. 288 (Cal. 1868)

Citing Cases

Hartman v. Olvera

The Court can make the payment of a sum of money a condition precedent to opening a default. (36 Cal. 288; 41…