From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Leerburger v. Hennessey Realty Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 9, 1915
108 N.E. 1093 (N.Y. 1915)

Summary

In Leerburger v. Hennessey Realty Co. (154 A.D. 158, 214 N.Y. 659) there was no question as to the effect of the different street levels.

Summary of this case from Iguera v. Benz

Opinion

Argued February 1, 1915

Decided March 9, 1915

H.B. Davis for appellants.

Everett V. Abbot for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs, as to defendant Hennessey Realty Company. Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide event, as to defendant Polstein, on the ground that the finding did not suffice to charge him with liability.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, CUDDEBACK and HOGAN, JJ. Dissents as to reversal: SEABURY, J. Not sitting: MILLER, J.


Summaries of

Leerburger v. Hennessey Realty Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 9, 1915
108 N.E. 1093 (N.Y. 1915)

In Leerburger v. Hennessey Realty Co. (154 A.D. 158, 214 N.Y. 659) there was no question as to the effect of the different street levels.

Summary of this case from Iguera v. Benz
Case details for

Leerburger v. Hennessey Realty Company

Case Details

Full title:MATILDA LEERBURGER, Respondent, v . HENNESSEY REALTY COMPANY et al.…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 9, 1915

Citations

108 N.E. 1093 (N.Y. 1915)
214 N.Y. 659

Citing Cases

Iguera v. Benz

The cases of Riley v. Continuous Rail Joint Co. ( 110 A.D. 787), Bergen v. Morton Amusement Co., Inc. ( 178…