From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Swedish American Line.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 21, 1933
6 F. Supp. 342 (S.D.N.Y. 1933)

Opinion

December 21, 1933.

Jacob C. Spiro, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Haight, Smith, Griffin Deming, of New York City, for defendant.


The passage ticket in this case required notice of claim to be given within forty-five days after death, and that suit be commenced within one year "after the lodging of claim." These provisions are binding, even though the deceased was a 3 year old infant traveling on her mother's ticket [The Finland (D.C.) 35 F.2d 47]; and, inasmuch as the suit was not commenced until one month and nineteen days after the expiration of the one-year limitation period prescribed in the ticket, the action was barred [Martin v. Royal Mail Steam Packet Co. (D.C.) 1933 A.M.C. 1553, affirmed (C.C.A.) 65 F.2d 1019, certiorari denied (October 16, 1933) 54 S. Ct. 88, 78 L. Ed. ___]. Neither is it an answer that notice of claim was given within forty-five days after death, as both requirements of the passage ticket must be met before the action can be maintained.

Jury trial; no opinion.

The motion to dismiss is therefore granted.


Summaries of

Lee v. Swedish American Line.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 21, 1933
6 F. Supp. 342 (S.D.N.Y. 1933)
Case details for

Lee v. Swedish American Line.

Case Details

Full title:LEE et al. v. SWEDISH AMERICAN LINE

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 21, 1933

Citations

6 F. Supp. 342 (S.D.N.Y. 1933)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. Furness, Withy Co.

Provisions that appear on the ticket as part of the contract of passage embodied in the ticket are binding…

Horvath v. Cunard Steamship Co.

Also there is authority holding that the fact that the passenger was a minor or an infant does not relieve…