From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 21, 1999
739 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 98-1597.

Opinion filed July 21, 1999.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Peter Lopez, Judge, L.T. No. 97-22618.

Bennet H. Brummer, Public Defender and Harvey J. Sepler, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Sylvie Perez-Posner, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, COPE and GODERICH, JJ.


Leon Lee appeals his sentence as a violent career criminal under section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1997), on the ground that chapter 95-182, Laws of Florida (the "Officer Evelyn Gort and Fallen Officers Career Criminal Act of 1995"), which created that category of sentence, violated the single subject provision of the Florida Constitution. We affirm.

Assuming for purposes of discussion that there was a violation of the single subject rule, the only defendants who would be adversely affected are persons sentenced as violent career criminals with offense dates of October 1, 1995 through May 23, 1997. Effective May 24, 1997, the biennial reenactment of the Florida Statutes cured any violation of the single subject rule. See ch. 97-97, Laws of Fla. "The reenactment has the effect of adopting as the official statutory law of the state those portions of the statutes that are carried forward from the preceding adopted statutes. Once reenacted as a portion of the Florida Statutes, a chapter law is no longer subject to challenge on the grounds that it violates the single subject requirements of Article III, section 6, of the Florida Constitution." State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1, 2 (Fla. 1993).

This court has held that there was no single subject violation. See Valdes v. State, 728 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Holloway v. State, 712 So.2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA), review granted, 727 So.2d 906 (Fla. 1998); Higgs v. State, 695 So.2d 872, 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Contra Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1998).

Because appellant's offense date was July 12, 1997, there is no basis for a challenge to his sentence based on the single subject requirement. For this reason we decline to certify conflict with Thompson v. State, 708 So.2d 315 (Fla 2d DCA), review granted, 717 So.2d 538 (Fla. 1998).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jul 21, 1999
739 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Lee v. State

Case Details

Full title:LEON LEE, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jul 21, 1999

Citations

739 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Smith v. State

The state properly concedes that defendant is entitled to be resentenced as the supreme court has held that…

Roger v. State

Any reliance on Thompson v. State, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla. Case no. 92,831, opinion filed, December 22, 1999),…