Lee v. State

Full title: MICHAEL FITZGERALD LEE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 19, 1988

518 So. 2d 963 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 85-2612.

January 19, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Arthur Maginnis, Judge.

H.T. Smith, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court, and, pursuant to our directions, a de novo hearing on the defendant's motion to suppress was conducted. See Lee v. State, 499 So.2d 66 (Fla.3d DCA 1987). The trial court again denied the motion to suppress, and we affirm. Roman v. State, 475 So.2d 1228 (Fla. 1985); Kee v. State, 504 So.2d 1365 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Williams v. State, 403 So.2d 453 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); James v. State, 223 So.2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).

Affirmed.