From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Samsung Elecs. Am.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Oct 12, 2022
Civil Action 4:21-CV-01321 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 12, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 4:21-CV-01321

10-12-2022

ADAM LEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendant.


AMENDED ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

KEITH P. ELLISON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Defendant Samsung's Motion to Strike. (Doc. 24.) On September 21, 2022, United States Magistrate Judge Dena Hanovice Palermo issued a Report and Recommendation in this case, recommending that the motion be granted. (Doc. 50.) Plaintiffs filed a notice of non-objection on October 11, 2022. (Doc. 53.)

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), the Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error. Finding no clear error, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly, Defendant's Motion is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lee v. Samsung Elecs. Am.

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
Oct 12, 2022
Civil Action 4:21-CV-01321 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Lee v. Samsung Elecs. Am.

Case Details

Full title:ADAM LEE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: Oct 12, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 4:21-CV-01321 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 12, 2022)

Citing Cases

Rathmann v. Ford Motor Co.

The Fifth Circuit has repeatedly found that class issues fail to predominate when the plaintiff asserts fraud…