From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. O'Malley

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 5, 2007
249 F. App'x 966 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-1369.

Submitted: September 24, 2007.

Decided: October 5, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:06-cv-01039-RDB).

Reginald Lee, Appellant Pro Se. William Rowe Phelan, Jr., Baltimore City Law Department, Baltimore, Maryland; Patrick Donald Sheridan, Baltimore Police Department, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Reginald Lee appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lee v. O'Malley, No. 1:06-cv-01039-RDB (D.Md. Mar. 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Lee v. O'Malley

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 5, 2007
249 F. App'x 966 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Lee v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:Reginald LEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Martin O'MALLEY, Baltimore City…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 5, 2007

Citations

249 F. App'x 966 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Crystal v. Batts

See Md.-Nat'l Capital Park & Planning Comm'n v. Kranz, 521 A.2d 729, 731 (Md. 1987) ("As this Court has often…