From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. Lampert

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 8, 2011
633 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2011)

Summary

ordering rehearing of the panel decision holding that there is no "actual innocence" exception to the habeas statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Pacheco v. Small

Opinion

No. 09-35276.

February 8, 2011.

Stephen R. Sady, FPDOR — Federal Public Defender's Office, Portland, OR, for Petitioner-Appellee.

Erin C. Lagesen, Assistant Attorney General, Carolyn Alexander, Esquire, Assistant Attorney General, Oregon Department of Justice, Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, AGOR — Office of the Oregon Attorney General, Salem, OR, for Respondents-Appellant.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Murguia did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.


Summaries of

Lee v. Lampert

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 8, 2011
633 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2011)

ordering rehearing of the panel decision holding that there is no "actual innocence" exception to the habeas statute of limitations

Summary of this case from Pacheco v. Small
Case details for

Lee v. Lampert

Case Details

Full title:Richard R. LEE, Petitioner-Appellee v. Robert O. LAMPERT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 8, 2011

Citations

633 F.3d 1176 (9th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Witkin v. Yates

Although the court will deny respondent's motion to dismiss without prejudice, petitioner's May 2, 2011…

Pacheco v. Small

Whether or not an assertion of innocence allows a habeas petitioner to avoid the 28 U.S.C. § See 2244(d)…