From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ledezma-Cosino v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 12, 2016
839 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 12-73289

10-12-2016

Salomon Ledezma–Cosino, aka Cocino Soloman Ledesma, Petitioner, v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General, Respondent.


ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

Ledezma-Cosino v. Lynch

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 12, 2016
839 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Ledezma-Cosino v. Lynch

Case Details

Full title:SALOMON LEDEZMA-COSINO, aka Cocino Soloman Ledesma, Petitioner, v. LORETTA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 12, 2016

Citations

839 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

Ledezma-Cosino v. Sessions

Upon grant of rehearing en banc, the panel's opinion was vacated. Ledezma-Cosino v. Lynch , 839 F.3d 805 (9th…

Hendrick v. Caldwell

However, Ledezma–Cosino is inapplicable for at least three reasons. First, the Ninth Circuit granted a…