From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

L'Ecluse v. Brokaw

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 6, 1924
238 N.Y. 611 (N.Y. 1924)

Opinion

Submitted May 23, 1924

Decided June 6, 1924

Rowland Miles for appellant.

Willard N. Baylis and Robert S. Snevily for respondent.


Appeal dismissed, with costs, on ground that the Appellate Division having unanimously reinstated the verdict leave to appeal was necessary ( Burns Mfg. Co. v. Clinchfield Products Corp., 231 N.Y. 561); no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CARDOZO, POUND, McLAUGHLIN, CRANE, ANDREWS and LEHMAN, JJ.


Summaries of

L'Ecluse v. Brokaw

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 6, 1924
238 N.Y. 611 (N.Y. 1924)
Case details for

L'Ecluse v. Brokaw

Case Details

Full title:MILTON L'ECLUSE, Respondent, v . W. GOULD BROKAW, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 6, 1924

Citations

238 N.Y. 611 (N.Y. 1924)

Citing Cases

Markiewicz v. Thompson

From the judgment entered upon the verdict, the plaintiff has taken this appeal after leave to appeal had…