From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Le Sannom Building Corp. v. Dudek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 19, 1991
177 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 19, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam Altman, J.).


The appeal from the order of the same court, entered August 2, 1991, is dismissed as subsumed by the judgment, without costs.

Plaintiffs, the owner and managing agent of a building that has been designated as an interim multiple dwelling pursuant to article 7-C of the Multiple Dwelling Law, bring this action for defamation and civil conspiracy against the last remaining residential tenants of the building. The first cause of action, based on a letter written by defendants' attorney to the New York City Loft Board accusing plaintiff managing agent of having lied to the Board, is not actionable, the communication being absolutely privileged having been made by a party or attorney in a quasi-judicial proceeding concerning a matter material and pertinent to the proceeding, namely, plaintiff's credibility (Park Knoll Assocs. v. Schmidt, 59 N.Y.2d 205, 209-210; Schettino v. Alter, 140 A.D.2d 600).

The second cause of action, wherein plaintiffs quote a portion of a prior decision by the IAS court in another action between these parties, which paraphrased statements made by one of the defendants to the Loft Board, does not set forth the alleged defamatory words in haec verba as required by CPLR 3016 (a) (Monsanto v. Electronic Data Sys. Corp., 141 A.D.2d 514, 516); in any event, the alleged slanderous statements were made to the Loft Board in a quasi-judicial administrative proceeding, and are absolutely privileged (Schettino v. Alter, supra).

The third cause of action, alleging that defendants conspired to deprive plaintiff-owner of rent and otherwise damage its business, was properly dismissed since New York does not recognize an independent tort of civil conspiracy, and no specific wrongful acts constituting an independent tort are alleged (Alexander Alexander v. Fritzen, 68 N.Y.2d 968).

We have reviewed the plaintiffs' remaining claims and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Ross, Asch and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

Le Sannom Building Corp. v. Dudek

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 19, 1991
177 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Le Sannom Building Corp. v. Dudek

Case Details

Full title:LE SANNOM BUILDING CORP. et al., Appellants, v. PETER DUDEK et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 19, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 390 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
576 N.Y.S.2d 133

Citing Cases

Stryker Sec. Grp., Inc. v. Elite Investigations Ltd.

Generally, the complaint "must allege the precise words spoken or published, and not merely the tenor,…

Romeo v. Village of Fishkill

Allan Allan Arts v. Rosenblum, 201 A.D.2d 136, cert. denied 516 U.S. 914). The record supports the assertion…