From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Duc v. Blumenthal

Supreme Court of California
Jul 19, 1938
11 Cal.2d 780 (Cal. 1938)

Opinion

Docket Nos. L.A. 16666, 16667, 16668.

July 19, 1938.

APPEALS from orders of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County setting aside judgments of dismissal. Robert W. Kenny, Judge. Affirmed on motion.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

R.D. McLaughlin, Walter I. Lyon, Walter T. Casey and Albert Lee Casey for Appellants.

Don L. Gilman and Entenza Gramer for Respondents.


THE COURT.

These three cases are companion cases to McNeil v. Blumenthal, L.A. NO. 16665 ( ante, p. 566 [81 P.2d 567]) this day decided. They are before this court on motion of plaintiffs to dismiss the appeal of defendants from an order of the trial court granting relief pursuant to section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or to affirm the order. [1] The question presented is identical with that determined in the McNeil case. Therefore, on that authority, the respective orders appealed from in these three cases are, and each of them is, hereby affirmed.


Summaries of

Duc v. Blumenthal

Supreme Court of California
Jul 19, 1938
11 Cal.2d 780 (Cal. 1938)
Case details for

Duc v. Blumenthal

Case Details

Full title:HAZEL LE DUC, Respondent, v. MAURICE BLUMENTHAL et al., Appellants. JOSEPH…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jul 19, 1938

Citations

11 Cal.2d 780 (Cal. 1938)
81 P.2d 567