From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Layz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 30, 1994
205 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

June 30, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Stanley Sklar, J.).


We agree with the IAS Court that the motion papers, which included, inter alia, an affirmation by an obstetrician-gynecologist that various acts and omissions of defendants at the time of decedent's birth constituted malpractice, and were a proximate cause of plaintiff's decedent's brain damage and eventual death, constituted a sufficient evidentiary showing to support the added cause of action for wrongful death (see, CPLR 3025 [b]; cf., McGuire v. Small, 129 A.D.2d 429).

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Wallach, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Layz v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 30, 1994
205 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Layz v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:MILAGROS LAYZ, Individually and as Administratrix of JOSE J. CORREA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 30, 1994

Citations

205 A.D.2d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
613 N.Y.S.2d 908

Citing Cases

Gambles v. Davis

" To support the amendment sought here, plaintiff was required to submit "competent medical proof of the…

Spina-Sterling v. Birnbaum

While plaintiff did not annex any medical evidence to his moving papers, plaintiff did submit a redacted…