Summary
holding “summary judgment was proper because [plaintiff] failed to demonstrate the denial of a constitutional right”
Summary of this case from Hoagland v. Ada Cnty.Opinion
No. 09-1536.
Submitted: November 27, 2009.
Filed: December 14, 2009.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.
Kimberly Lawson, Dallas, TX, pro se.
Andrew J. Bracken, Amanda G. Wachuta, Ahlers Cooney, Des Moines, IA, for Appellees.
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
[UNPUBLISHED]
Kimberly Lawson appeals following the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, see Johnson v. Blaukat, 453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that summary judgment was proper because Lawson failed to demonstrate the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
The Honorable Ross A. Walters, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of Iowa, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).