From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawrence v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 22, 1997
268 Ga. 420 (Ga. 1997)

Opinion

S97Q0968.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 22, 1997

Certified Question from the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Steven H. Sadow, for appellant.

J. Tom Morgan, District Attorney, Gregory J. Lohmeier, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The Court of Appeals has certified four questions to this Court under the authority of Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. V, Par. IV; and Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (7). Lawrence v. State of Ga.,, 225 Ga. App. 606 ( 484 S.E.2d 341) (1997). The questions certified seek application of the specific facts of this case to the law and seek resolution of the ultimate issue on appeal. Under our case law, when the answer to a certified question would constitute the decision in the main case, this court will decline to answer the question. Thorp v. State, 264 Ga. 712, 718 ( 450 S.E.2d 416) (1994). Only questions that present distinct issues of law are properly certified to this court. Louisville c. R. Co. v. Hood, 149 Ga. 829 ( 102 S.E. 521) (1920). Since the certified questions do not conform to this requirement, and because the trial court did not rule on any constitutional question, the questions were improperly certified to this Court by the Court of Appeals. The case is hereby returned to the Court of Appeals.

For the foregoing reasons, the certified questions are not answered. All the Justices concur.


DECIDED SEPTEMBER 22, 1997.


Summaries of

Lawrence v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 22, 1997
268 Ga. 420 (Ga. 1997)
Case details for

Lawrence v. State

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE v. STATE OF GEORGIA

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 22, 1997

Citations

268 Ga. 420 (Ga. 1997)
489 S.E.2d 850

Citing Cases

In re Interest of J.F.

Id. at 68, 90 S.E. 527. Since Lynch , when this Court's opinions have addressed our authority to answer…

Couch v. Red Roof Inns, Inc.

Such a realistic outcome is not efficient, is not accurate, and is not just. Because this Court does not…