From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawrence v. Paramount Residential Mortg. Grp.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Nov 16, 2021
3:19-cv-02103-JR (D. Or. Nov. 16, 2021)

Opinion

3:19-cv-02103-JR

11-16-2021

MARCKIA LAWRENCE, Plaintiff, v. PARAMOUNT RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE GROUP, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

MARCO A. HERNANDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Magistrate Judge Russo issued a Findings and Recommendation on October 12, 2021, in which she recommends that the Court deny Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees. F&R, ECF 56. The matter is now before the Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Russo's Findings and Recommendation No. 56.

Accordingly, Defendant's Motion for Attorney Fees [51] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lawrence v. Paramount Residential Mortg. Grp.

United States District Court, District of Oregon
Nov 16, 2021
3:19-cv-02103-JR (D. Or. Nov. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Lawrence v. Paramount Residential Mortg. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:MARCKIA LAWRENCE, Plaintiff, v. PARAMOUNT RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE GROUP…

Court:United States District Court, District of Oregon

Date published: Nov 16, 2021

Citations

3:19-cv-02103-JR (D. Or. Nov. 16, 2021)

Citing Cases

Bailey v. FirstBank

Id.; Lawrence v. Paramount Residential Mortg. Grp., Inc., No. 3:19-cv-02103-JR, 2021 WL 5356968, at *3 (D.…