From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawrence v. Emigrant Mortg. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-3569 (ES) (D.N.J. Oct. 18, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-3569 (ES)

10-18-2012

MERLA LAWRENCE, Plaintiff, v. EMIGRANT MORTGAGE COMPANY, PRIME TIME MORTGAGE CORP., RETAINED REALTY, INC., DARNELL DAVIS, and KENNETH P. SAMSON Defendants.


ORDER

SALAS, DISTRICT JUDGE For the reasons set forth in the Opinion filed herewith,

IT IS on this 18th day of October 2012,

ORDERED that Plaintiff Merla Lawrence's motion for reconsideration—(D.E. 28)—is hereby DENIED, and Plaintiff has 30 days from receipt of this Order in which to file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies addressed by the Court in its March 30, 2012 Opinion; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to amend—(D.E. 29)—is hereby DENIED as moot; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall terminate Docket Entry Nos. 28 and 29.

___________

Esther Salas , U.S.D.J.


Summaries of

Lawrence v. Emigrant Mortg. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Oct 18, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-3569 (ES) (D.N.J. Oct. 18, 2012)
Case details for

Lawrence v. Emigrant Mortg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:MERLA LAWRENCE, Plaintiff, v. EMIGRANT MORTGAGE COMPANY, PRIME TIME…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: Oct 18, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-3569 (ES) (D.N.J. Oct. 18, 2012)

Citing Cases

Simoni v. Diamond

Notably, a motion seeking reconsideration may not be used by a party to "restate arguments that the court has…

Rush v. Portfolio Recovery Assocs. LLC

The reconsideration vehicle may not be used by parties to “restate arguments that the court has already…