From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Law Fin. Grp. v. Key

Supreme Court of California.
Nov 10, 2021
286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 249 (Cal. 2021)

Opinion

S270798

11-10-2021

LAW FINANCE GROUP v. KEY


The request for judicial notice is granted.

The petition for review is granted.

Pending review, the opinion of the Court of Appeal, which is currently published at 67 Cal.App.5th 307, 282 Cal.Rptr.3d 125, may be cited, not only for its persuasive value, but also for the limited purpose of establishing the existence of a conflict in authority that would in turn allow trial courts to exercise discretion under Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 456, 20 Cal.Rptr. 321, 369 P.2d 937, to choose between sides of any such conflict. (See Standing Order Exercising Authority Under California Rules of Court, Rule 8.1115(e)(3), Upon Grant of Review or Transfer of a Matter with an Underlying Published Court of Appeal Opinion, Administrative Order 2021-04-21; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(e)(3) and corresponding Comment, par. 2.)

Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C.J., Corrigan, Liu, Kruger, Groban and Jenkins, JJ.


Summaries of

Law Fin. Grp. v. Key

Supreme Court of California.
Nov 10, 2021
286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 249 (Cal. 2021)
Case details for

Law Fin. Grp. v. Key

Case Details

Full title:LAW FINANCE GROUP v. KEY

Court:Supreme Court of California.

Date published: Nov 10, 2021

Citations

286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 249 (Cal. 2021)
286 Cal. Rptr. 3d 249

Citing Cases

Darby v. Sisyphian, LLC

If a petition to confirm the award is filed fewer than 90 days after an award is served, a competing request…