From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laute v. Gearhart

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 2, 1934
170 A. 646 (N.J. 1934)

Opinion

Argued October 26, 1933 —

Decided February 2, 1934.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 117.

For the appellant, Samuel T. French and Harvey F. Carr.

For the respondent, Robert Bright, Allen S. Morgan and S. Rusling Leap.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Eldredge in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHIEF JUSTICE, TRENCHARD, PARKER, LLOYD, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, DILL, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Laute v. Gearhart

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 2, 1934
170 A. 646 (N.J. 1934)
Case details for

Laute v. Gearhart

Case Details

Full title:EMMA LAUTE AND MARY A. WHITE, APPELLANTS, v. GRACE THURBER GEARHART…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 2, 1934

Citations

170 A. 646 (N.J. 1934)
170 A. 646

Citing Cases

Patrick v. Brago

But the summons cannot be amended where the amendment would make the record show that a person has been…

Martin v. Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.

These powers formed the basis for the conclusion reached in the Giardini, Wilson, Norko and other cases and…