From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laureano v. Louzoun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 24, 1990
165 A.D.2d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

September 24, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On January 21, 1985, the plaintiff, a tenant in the defendants' premises, arose from bed at approximately 5:00 A.M. and put two large pots of water on her stove to boil. While in the process of pouring the boiling water from one pot into the other, the plaintiff banged the pots against each other, causing the boiling water to spill onto her knee and feet. The plaintiff commenced the instant action, alleging, inter alia, that the defendants' negligence in failing to provide heat and hot water to the premises and in failing to maintain the boiler in proper working condition caused the incident and her resulting injuries. The plaintiff further alleged that the defendants had constructive notice of the defective condition at least two weeks prior to the incident, as well as actual notice. The defendants moved for summary judgment on the ground that their conduct was not, as a matter of law, the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries. The trial court granted the motion holding that "[t]here was no connection of proximate cause between the lack of heat and the accident". We affirm.

The defendants' failure to provide heat and hot water to the premises was not the proximate cause, as a matter of law, of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff. While the defendants' conduct gave rise to the plaintiff's attempt to provide a substitute supply of heat, the act of boiling water was not the direct cause of the injuries (see, Martinez v. Lazaroff, 66 A.D.2d 874, affd 48 N.Y.2d 819). Rather, the intervening act of banging one pot against the other brought about the injuries sustained by the plaintiff. Those injuries would not have resulted from the failure to supply hot water alone, and cannot be classified as injuries normally to have been expected to ensue from the landlord's conduct (Martinez v. Lazaroff, 48 N.Y.2d 819, 820, supra; cf., Pagan v. Goldberger, 51 A.D.2d 508). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Lawrence and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Laureano v. Louzoun

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 24, 1990
165 A.D.2d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Laureano v. Louzoun

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA LAUREANO, Appellant, v. GILBERT LOUZOUN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 24, 1990

Citations

165 A.D.2d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
560 N.Y.S.2d 337

Citing Cases

Hosten v. Oladapo

It is settled law that the failure to supply adequate heat or hot water is not the proximate cause of…

Hosten v. Oladapo

It is settled law that the failure to supply adequate heat or hot water is not the proximate cause of…