From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lau v. Silva

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 5, 2007
No. CIV S-04-2351 WBS DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-04-2351 WBS DAD PS.

February 5, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On November 20, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 20, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motion to strike and for sanctions is denied.


Summaries of

Lau v. Silva

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 5, 2007
No. CIV S-04-2351 WBS DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2007)
Case details for

Lau v. Silva

Case Details

Full title:LOK T. LAU, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY V. SILVA, P.C., et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 5, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-04-2351 WBS DAD PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2007)

Citing Cases

Anhar v. Citibank

Lau v. Silva, 2006 WL 3359205, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 20, 2006), report and recommendation adopted sub nom.…